Dear March—Come In, Emily Dickinson; Four Years Later by Julia Kolchinsky; Anthem for Doomed Youth by Wilfred Owen; She says, being forbidden: -- by Leonora Speyer; The Traveling Onion by Naomi Shihab Nye; Coffee in the Afternoon by Alberto Rios; Birdbath by Henri Cole;
A final Poem to enjoy as a PS by Seamus Heaney: https://poems.com/poem/postscript/ (Thank you Bart)
Preamble to Nutshell for March 11-13, 2026
I believe Poetry is the handmaiden of serendipity because every week, a certain magic happens when a group of people come together and read aloud a bunch of poems. Who would think that a breathless em-dashed Dickinson poem about March written in 1874,
a 2026 villanelle about the on-going war 4 years after the Russian invasion of Ukraine,
a 1917 sonnet by Wilfred Owens, written in an Edinburgh hospital, where he was treated for shell shock,
a 1926 sonnet referencing Canut the Great,
a contemporary parable about an onion, a narrative about a visit over coffee, and a poem of 14 unrhymed lines filled with the emotional force referencing what is delivered by song,
not only could provide a memorable hour of animated discussion, but seemed to be matched as if to celebrate the way poetry can catch the heart off guard and blow it open (last line of the dividend poem, Postscript, by Seamus Heaney.You can see already from the hyperlinks, each piece is loaded with a treasury of references and contexts.
Add to this, countless stories, associations, in the discussions, such as the wit of Ogden Nash, coffee with the meal or the delight of the tongue twister lyrics from Trout Fishing in America's "All I want is a Proper Cup of Coffee" and the opening quote by Ross Gay, " The heart's perhaps the most reliable clock we have. This link will bring you to the October 2022 issue where you can read his words about Auden's poem "In Memory of W.B. Yeats" It's not that "Poetry makes nothing happen." but rather, as Ross points out, what happens is that poetry spreads seeds which lie dormant, and then bloom out of control like wildflowers in a summer meadow when given the fire of a common hearth around which we gather, feasting on the act of communal sharing.
Nutshell of discussion of the poems:
Dear March: At first read, it would seem an enchanting celebration of this month known for its gusty nature and what some call "March Madness", with a little tongue-in-cheek humor as if the month were a special lover. Who is speaking? When the breathless litany of welcome, of questions, of accusation calms down in the last four lines, Emily provides us with an insight into our human paradox of love-hate relationships with seasons and weather. Perhaps there is a bit of dismissal-- and she doesn't really allow March to answer her question 7th line, how are you, and the Rest. Instead, she teases us with a play on double meaning of "rest" when things hibernate in Winter, and implies the larger "rest of nature" with which March is spending its time outside its designated season.
The trilling of t's -- triffles look for trivial turns the opening "Dear March" from a private letter, to what is dear, as in precious, or perhaps what comes at a price, as we blame what we praise and vice-versa. She capitalizes many of the nouns, but blame, mentioned twice, only receives a capital letter when it concludes the poem, side by side with Praise, (twice-capitalized). The deft touch of the rhyming of dear/mere as interchangeable descriptions emphasizes the contradictory and inconstant attitudes we adopt with blame and praise. Will you greet March differently now each year? Or even each time you read this poem! There is no one analysis, no singular certainty here, but rather an echo to the many flavors and personalities of March with a small underlining of what it is the heart desires.
Four Years Later: The hyperlinks will lead you to Kolchinsky's bio and her other poems about the Russian invasion and on-going war. The power of the villanelle lies in the repeating of the two lines: It's difficult to remember the war.//Everything returns as it was before. What do we choose to remember about the past? Fail to recognize or even mention?
Anthem: Wilfred Owens was friend with Siegfried Sassoon fellow anti-war poet, who suggested Anthem for the title, and that the adjective doomed replace dead. Written in October 1917 while recuperating from shell-shock in an Edinburgh hospital, this sonnet has a visceral effect with the rapid rattle of repeated consonants and grim images. As one participant whose husband is a war veteran commented, one senses the anger of a soldier caught in the brutal absurdity of the first world war. The villanelle before, is from the viewpoint more of distant observer. Both use poetry to make sense of being caught in the violence of wars which should never have been.
She says, being forbidden: Published in 1926, the title of this sonnet sounds like it could be a woman's lib poem. As I quoted from Harriet Monroe in the footnote ," her prevailing mood is that of a conqueror; she hits back against whatever blows of fate, and faces even death unbowed.” Be that as it may, the poem becomes even more powerful when you realize it is referencing Canut the Great and lesson of waves.
The Traveling Onion: The epigraph explains the history of the onion, however, the adjective, traveling gives a folk or fairytale flavor to the title. It is soon clear this is more than an ode extoling the onion for its physical qualities, honoring its commendable humility in its career! Oh the stories, the recipes even a reference to Shrek and how Ogres are like onions (starts at minute .47 on the hyperlink. Back to the poem, lesson, delivered like a moral in a fable, points to translucence, not needing to stay around to be given credit or recognition. Here is another example an "onion" poem.
Coffee in the Afternoon: Who is he? Who is she? We had as many conjectures as participants. Did they know each other? Did the poet just make the whole scene up? I was delighted with the variety of responses. Many anecdotes of unusual encounters over coffee were shared but also some were sensitive to the possibility of a "grief visit", or an "end-of-life visit". Whatever scenario, the poem by the lack of specificity about who, when, where, allows the reader to pick up on clues and expand on them. For example, how do you make a pot of coffee from memory? How the 5th stanza sounds like a repeated visit, not just a repeated gesture of helping oneself to "tea food". Most everyone agreed the key was that the visit was liniment-- and after, tea or coffee, confusion plain and nice and a balm for the nerves of two people in the world.
The last couplet packs an emotional punch to the simplicity of the power of such a simple moment. Most agreed the final line no matter how enigmatic, confirms the importance of the visit, no matter the missing details about the people involved.
Birdbath. If you didn't look him up already, Henri Cole comes from an unusual background.
We laughed heartily at line 4, and relished the anthropomorphism of birds and italicized words of what men say, which imitates sounds of a robin. How is it when an Opera sings the story it is so different from silently reading the words? Cole tosses us the challenge to live and sing the things we cannot say.
A hearty thank you to everyone who attended.
PS to myself.
Postscript -- I originally had all 4 lines.
You are neither here nor there,/ A hurry through which known and strange things pass/As big soft buffetings come at the car sideways/ And catch the heart off guard and blow it open.from Rattle: This link will take you to her other poems about the invasion. This poem written in 2022 gives some of her biography and an example of erasure technique -- in this case Putin's February 21, 2022 speech that rewrites history as justification for war.
I had cited these three lines: The heart's perhaps the most reliable clock we have -- Ross Gayhttps://www.bookey.app/book/inciting-joy/quote
All those hours spent trying to outstare the distance of what the days must come to. Carl Philips
The poem as the champagne of what the body has bottled in its strain -- Ed Roberson